There were two pictures given to us to discuss, the first one is the cover page of the Time magazine, showing the crash of the World Trade Centre on 9/11, 2001. The feeling of panic and horror had instantly rushed to my head as this is one of the most unbelievable terrorist attacks in the globe. When we were asked about the comments of this crisis, I did not say anything due to my poor English but I actually very interested in the conspiracy (after googling it now I know what it is called in English )within it. There are a lot of documentaries on youtube that I suggest everyone should have a good reconsider and think about the meaning behind this event. We were talking about the date we saw this news on TV and it was amazing how nearly everyone of class remember this so well and had a great feeling about that on the day they watched the news. For me, I did not know this is a serious crisis and was not taking this seriously due to the young age and the poor sense of politic at that time. I had a feeling that I need to know more about the politics and keep update with the news while listening to other's comments on this cover page.
With a really serious emotion, we were introduced to this ridiculous CD cover. The first thing came to my head were, what are those two idiots doing; it is so offensive to the people who past away or have suffered from serious mental and physical damages since that date. I think they are disgraceful as a citizen and the whole design is just awful. However, this CD cover was surprising released before 9/11/2001, what a coincidence. The feeling before had gone unexpectedly and I feel sorry for those 'singers'. I think the way we think are so easily changed by looking at a different way or know the meaning behind, I indignantly changed my thought of the CD cover and feel so shame about it. Understanding the context of an art piece or everything is vital in responding and judging correctly and learning to learn is equally important. I found this seminar extremely thought provoking and I enjoy theoretical lessons like this where I can listen and respond and learn from others.
We were also given two animations to analyse:
Jiri Trnka, The Hand, 1965
The first emotion after
watching this animation was uneasy and quite gloomy. There are no speech
or catalogue in this animation where as the sound effects and images speak
for him. I see the main puppet character as the artists or normal citizens in a
country. He seems like a pottery artist who specifically makes pots for
his treasure plant which he gives careful care and protection to. There is a
big hand keeps harassing him from his daily life. It brainwash him by forcing
the puppet to watch documents about how good the hand is and to force him to
make statue out of him. To me, the hand indicates the government or any power
to control others, stopping the artists from creating and confiscate their
freedom. The puppet fights so hard against the hand but unfortunately he is so
weak to win and therefore he is captive and controlled to work in a birdcage.
The hand gives him badges and awards but they mean nothing to him. At the
end, the puppet escapes but no one is waiting
for him but death. The meaning behind is deep and considerable. As a citizen,
should we agree everything the government suggests even they could be
wrong? This allows me to relate to Hong Kong nowadays, where the protesters are
fighting against the government for their own right to elect the chief
executive. He
is weak and vulnerable when fighting alone
but what if the puppet has friends or a group of teammates, the ending of the
story might change into a happy ending. I think the settings and the sound
effects are absolutely amazing, I feel so tense when the thrilling music
comes and I think the music has successfully bring the right atmosphere to the
animation. The settings are delicately made and the use of different material
allows textural experience to the audience. I also like the storyline, which
slowly and clearly bring out the topic, the camera angles are also well
planned to show key moments in order to explain the story in detail.
Dusan Vokotic & Zagreb Film, Surogat, 1961
The animation graphic and
has an old style of art that the characters and stage are mainly consist of
simple lines and shapes. Again, this animation is also no catalogue but
this time the main character whistle to show his mood. At first, the little man
goes to the beach and pulls out a lot of random shapes out and starts
inflating them into different objects. I laughed when he hangs the fish on the
hook to pretend he catches it, good sense of humor and brilliantly
use of the props. He then inflates a relatively sexy lady so as to fit his
prefect vacation however a hot guy ruins his plan. Eventually, he manages to
get over it and pack up home but the ending is quite un-expectable where he is
also deflated. I think the story is easy to understand and I do not see any
complicated meaning behind but it amazed me by its creativity. I appreciate the
use of shapes and the colour, which simplify the animation and suitable to any
age group. The idea of deflating the things he unwanted is useful but too much erases
might leads to the death of him. Liny illustration is something I have never
tried before, there are a lot of useful materials in the animation I can take reference
from and I hope to try this working style.
No comments:
Post a Comment